As an organization grows, the person at the top is usually the last to know. We look at 'management by wandering around' (MBWA) and the visibility problem.
As an organization grows, the leader at the top typically gains more resources and more authority — but paradoxically, their visibility into the real state of daily operations shrinks. This is one of the least discussed, yet most common, problems in business leadership.
As the number of management layers in an organization increases, information gets summarized, filtered, and reinterpreted at every layer. A small problem a frontline employee notices, by the time it passes through three management layers to reach the leader, has either arrived too late or lost its original significance. This isn't malicious information-hoarding — it's the natural result of each layer choosing "what matters" from its own vantage point.
The concept of "management by wandering around" (MBWA), popularized in Tom Peters and Robert Waterman's 1982 book "In Search of Excellence," came out of Hewlett-Packard's early management culture: rather than waiting in their offices for reports, leaders would regularly go out to the floor and observe directly, reaching unfiltered information. The goal of this approach wasn't to check up on people — it was to see, firsthand, the details reports tend to miss.
Today, many organizations are too large or too distributed to physically "wander around" (remote teams, multiple locations). The modern equivalent of MBWA is direct access to live, unfiltered operational data — a leader being able to look at a dashboard and see what's really happening on the ground, without waiting for a summarized report. The goal stays the same: leadership having access to raw reality, not reality filtered layer by layer.
The question a leader should ask isn't "bring me more reports" — it's "how many hands did this information pass through before it reached me."
Explore more of our articles on this topic.
